Dear S.C.
Some plastic surgeons are using complete unders as a
marketing tool to differentiate themselves
from other plastic surgeons.They suggest that complete unders are
better than partial unders.
Several years ago there were a few articles in the plastic surgery
journals suggesting that complete
sub-muscular augmentation was better than the more common partial
sub-muscular augmentation.
The vast majority of plastic surgeons who have experience
in both techniques, now believe that
partial submuscular implants look more natural than complete submuscular
implants.
The original description of the complete submuscular implant was
described using an inframammary
incision. More lately some surgeons have described performing this
technique through an axillary
incision. The suggestion that this technique results in less bottoming
out is simply not true. Bottoming
out is an unusual complication which occurs with equal frequency
no matter where the incision is
placed.
There are several problems with the total submuscular
placement of a breast implant. First of all a
totally submuscular implant tends to look rounder than a partially
submuscular implant. The totally
under breast tends to look more symmetrically round...like an upside-down
soup bowl with as much
implant above the nipple as below. But this is not how a breast
should look. A natural breast should
look slightly fuller below the nipple than above. This gives the
breast the natural look of a not too bulgy
top and nice fullness below. WIth a partially under breast implant
this occurs because the muscle
covers and flattens the top of the breast implant but leaves the
bottom uncovered to give the nice
inferior fullness. With a totally under implant the muscle covering
the lower pole of the implant results
in lower pole flattening and superior bulging, which is a very unnatural
look.
The other problem with a totally under breast implant
is that this is an "unnatural" dissection of the
breast. The pectoralis major muscle does not naturally totally cover
a breast implant. Normally (and
especially with a trans axillary approach) no muscle cutting is
required. The implant fits "naturally"
under the elevated muscle. With totally under implants the top of
the serratus anterior muscle and
anterior rectus abdominus fascia needs to be cut and elevated. This
results in a lot of cutting and a lot
of bleeding and bruising. All of this for a breast which looks like
an upside-down soup bowl.
Thats why the vast majority of surgeons now perform subpectoral
breast augmentation as a partial
submuscular operation.
Dr. Frank Lista M.D., F.R.C.S.C
www.theplasticsurgeryclinic.com
Click
here for Dr. Frank Lista's profile
|